Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Islamic Party Jamiat of Afghanistan
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Merge to Jamiat Islami. —Quarl (talk) 2007-04-08 09:15Z
- Islamic Party Jamiat of Afghanistan (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
Probably just a mixup with Jamiat Islami. Neither [1], [2], [3] give any indication of a party with this exact name. Soman 13:55, 29 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Move I think we should merge and move both of them to Islamic Society of Afghanistan or Party of the Islamic Society of Afghanistan--Sa.vakilian(t-c) 06:18, 30 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: My suggestion is merge and move to Jamaat-e Islami-ye Afghanistan and making Jamaat-e-Islami a disamb page. --Soman 13:11, 1 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, WjBscribe 00:13, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It does not appear that anyone has notified the creator or significant editors of this article about this AfD. This is considered to be civil under WP:AfD but is often ignored. This should be the responsibility of the initiators of the deletion process. I will provide the notice myself, time permitting, if no one else does so by tomorrow. Edivorce 22:25, 5 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This appears to be a direct copy of an earlier version of the Jamiat Islami page. --RaiderAspect 04:20, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Merge and redirect to Jamiat Islami, as the topic appears to be identical but the information provided is not. The ikiroid (talk·desk·Advise me) 15:18, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment I provided notices discussed above. Edivorce 16:45, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.